Syntactic Conditional Closures for Defeasible Reasoning
نویسنده
چکیده
An approach to nonmonotonic inference based on a closure operation on a conditional knowledge base is presented The central idea is that, given a theory of default conditionals, an extension to the theory le defined that satisfies certain intuitive restrictions Two notions for forming an extension are given, corresponding to the incorporation of irrelevant properties in conditionals and of transit ivity among condi tionals, in this approach these notions coincide Several equivalent definitions for an extension are developed general nonconstructive definitions, and a general "pseudo-iterative" definition Reasoning wi th irrelevant properties is correctly handled, as is specificity, reasoning within exceptional circumstances, and inheritance reasoning Tina approach is intented to ultimately serve as the proof-theoretic analogue to an extant semantic development based on preference orderings among possible worlds 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n A continuing problem in Arti f icial Intelligence is dealing with general, generic sentences that admit exceptions For example, suppose we are given that birds fly birds have wings, penguins are birds, and penguins don't fly We can write this in a propositional gloss as
منابع مشابه
Complexity Results for Default Reasoning from Conditional Knowledge Bases
Conditional knowledge bases have been proposed as belief bases that include defeasible rules (also called defaults) of the form “ ! ”, which informally read as “generally, if then .” Such rules may have exceptions, which can be handled in different ways. A number of entailment semantics for conditional knowledge bases have been proposed in the literature. However, while the semantic properties ...
متن کاملDefault reasoning from conditional knowledge bases: Complexity and tractable cases
Conditional knowledge bases have been proposed as belief bases that include defeasible rules (also called defaults) of the form “ ! ”, which informally read as “generally, if then .” Such rules may have exceptions, which can be handled in different ways. A number of entailment semantics for conditional knowledge bases have been proposed in the literature. However, while the semantic properties ...
متن کاملProbabilistic Default Reasoning with Strict and Defeasible Conditional Constraints Probabilistic Default Reasoning with Strict and Defeasible Conditional Constraints
We present an approach to reasoning about statistical knowledge and degrees of belief, which is based on a combination of probabilistic reasoning from conditional constraints and default reasoning from conditional knowledge bases. More precisely, we generalize the notions of Pearl's entailment in system , Lehmann's lexicographic entailment, and Geffner's conditional entailment to strict and def...
متن کاملDefeasible Reasoning with Quantifiers
Human conditional reasoning is defeasible: people withdraw logically valid conclusions if they are aware of situations (i.e., exceptions) that prevent the consequent of the rule to happen although the antecedent is given. In this paper we investigate defeasible reasoning with quantified rules. In two experiments we rephrased conditionals from the literature (Experiment 1) and rules from penal c...
متن کاملStable Closures, Defeasible Logic and Contradiction Tolerant Reasoning
A solution to the Yale shooting problem has been previously proposed that uses so-called non-normal defaults. This approach produces a single extension. One disadvantage, however, is . that new conflicting information causes the extension to collapse. In this paper we propose a new formal counterpart to the intuitive notion of a reasonable set of beliefs. The new formalization reduces to the pr...
متن کامل